kyles1483
08-27-2001, 12:21 AM
In FastSim29, I just won 120 games, but it doesnt seem like much because there were 8 teams with over 100 wins. Every team that reached the playoffs had 100 wins. I would say that most years in baseball you should make the playoffs with about 95 wins or so and usually only 1 team if any will win over 100. I won the most games because I spent the most, so it seems... all 8 teams were in the top 11 in expenses. Changing the money situation may fix this, I just thought it was weird that 8 teams made it to 100 and was wondering if you could make the game harder or have leagues where only moguls with high rankings could get into.
An idea for the balancing of the revenues could be to take the range of revenues (250ish-700ish) and contract by 100 points on the bottom end (350ish-700ish). So if a team were at 250 before he would now be at 350. If a team were at 300 then by making an equal proportion (multiplying original number by old range over new range ie. 300*(450/350)) then they will now have 386 points. This keeps the teams in proportion to the values already established and stays with the spirit of having rich and poor teams. And keeps the big teams like New York from having to dump salary (like Clay said). I was just throwing out an idea.
Please reply,
-Kyle
An idea for the balancing of the revenues could be to take the range of revenues (250ish-700ish) and contract by 100 points on the bottom end (350ish-700ish). So if a team were at 250 before he would now be at 350. If a team were at 300 then by making an equal proportion (multiplying original number by old range over new range ie. 300*(450/350)) then they will now have 386 points. This keeps the teams in proportion to the values already established and stays with the spirit of having rich and poor teams. And keeps the big teams like New York from having to dump salary (like Clay said). I was just throwing out an idea.
Please reply,
-Kyle