View Full Version : Why don't people get it!
senshuken
09-11-2004, 03:23 PM
I can't stand people who are so against this war. They don't understand or they just like to bash bush. Forget that bush is president and lets think about it.
There is alot in common between hitler and saddam.
Thank god saddam is not as smart as hitler but look at this.
Facts. Saddam is a bad guy. Saddam may not have had nuclear technology but it obvious he was trying and if he could he would get it. Now if saddam was ever able to aqcuirre neclear technology the world would be a scary place and we would definitly be at war with him then. So the question is would you rather go to war now and lose american lives for a cause or take the chance of gamble if he gets nuclear missle's or not. Because if he ever got them then we would lose alot more american lives, be in fear all the time and might have a nuclear attack on american soil or our troops!!
Now back to hitler. after WWI we ignored germany and let hitler build up a massive army. No one kept and eye on him till it was too late. he built and awsome army and ended up killing millions of people and americans. If someone were to stop him before he got to hae the power would have saved alot of lives and yes may hae lost some lives stopping him in the process but saved a ton in the long run.
After first gulf war we left saddam in power because he was weak. but now he started building up his army and looking for nuclear missle's. Now i know the cia knows alot we don't but i am sure they knew he wanted nuclear power. So this infact could have prevented a world war! a nuclear one at that.
SOMETIMES THE BEST DEFENSE IS A GOOD OFFENSE
kingmob
09-11-2004, 08:37 PM
Originally posted by senshuken
I can't stand people who are so against this war. They don't understand or they just like to bash bush. Forget that bush is president and lets think about it.
There is alot in common between hitler and saddam.
Thank god saddam is not as smart as hitler but look at this.
Facts. Saddam is a bad guy. Saddam may not have had nuclear technology but it obvious he was trying and if he could he would get it. Now if saddam was ever able to aqcuirre neclear technology the world would be a scary place and we would definitly be at war with him then. So the question is would you rather go to war now and lose american lives for a cause or take the chance of gamble if he gets nuclear missle's or not. Because if he ever got them then we would lose alot more american lives, be in fear all the time and might have a nuclear attack on american soil or our troops!!
Now back to hitler. after WWI we ignored germany and let hitler build up a massive army. No one kept and eye on him till it was too late. he built and awsome army and ended up killing millions of people and americans. If someone were to stop him before he got to hae the power would have saved alot of lives and yes may hae lost some lives stopping him in the process but saved a ton in the long run.
After first gulf war we left saddam in power because he was weak. but now he started building up his army and looking for nuclear missle's. Now i know the cia knows alot we don't but i am sure they knew he wanted nuclear power. So this infact could have prevented a world war! a nuclear one at that.
SOMETIMES THE BEST DEFENSE IS A GOOD OFFENSE
do you really believe all this ****? all your doing is parroting propaganda....WAR IS PEACE!
iraq was never a threat to us....if anything it will cause a nuclear buildup because other countries out there know the only way to keep the americans off of your arse is too have nukes
prescott bush and other elites in this country funded and supplied hitler and built him up.....you are nieve
prescott bush trading with the enemy (http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHGstore.cgi?user_action=detail&catalogno=NN_Bush_Nazi_Link)
senshuken
09-12-2004, 04:10 AM
dude did you graduate middleschool. Kingmob said and i quote "it will cause a nuclear buildup because other countries out there know the only way to keep the americans off of your arse is too have nukes"
What are you talking about. Think buddy, your a third world country now what do you learn from this? A) I could invade weaker countries and don't let un inpectors check if i am making nukes then the americans will kick our *** and over take our power and set up a democratic goverment. or B i could just remain in power and control the country and know that you don't need nukes because if anyone ever messed with you the americans and UN wouold defend you.
senshuken
09-12-2004, 04:15 AM
Think about it honestly if any country in the world could be the only country with nukes who would you want it too be.
I sure as **** would want it to be the americans. We are proven to be responsible with it and every american know we would never us nukes only as a last result. Thats proven. Now all these other countries who cry americans are bullies, I bet if they were in power they would abuse it.
**** ma n you american or not? I mean seriiously you got such a problem ge the **** out! I live in ny. I saw ground zero i know people who losed loved ones. You the same kind of american dweb who would have said all this if we attacked Bin landen and raided poor afganistan before sept 11th. If we left saddam alone alolt worse would have happenned. I mean no matter hat you say he was an evil man and getting rid of him was good for the planet
senshuken
09-12-2004, 04:18 AM
since i am venting i would just like to say the FRENCH SUCK!! One of our biggest mistake was losing american lives to save there asses. We should have let the germans take them over and today it would ve part of germany. I mean these people have the balls to condem us and try to tell us what to do?? we saved there asses in both world wars, not only should they shut up but they owe us big time and should have sent troops to fight with us. We lost thouusand of americans saving there asses.
kingmob
09-12-2004, 05:29 AM
Originally posted by senshuken
dude did you graduate middleschool. Kingmob said and i quote "it will cause a nuclear buildup because other countries out there know the only way to keep the americans off of your arse is too have nukes"
What are you talking about. Think buddy, your a third world country now what do you learn from this? A) I could invade weaker countries and don't let un inpectors check if i am making nukes then the americans will kick our *** and over take our power and set up a democratic goverment. or B i could just remain in power and control the country and know that you don't need nukes because if anyone ever messed with you the americans and UN wouold defend you.
ummm your the one not thinking.....iran, venezuala ,india , n.korea, s.korea, and yes japan either have nukes or are seeking them....we have never invaded a nuclear power so if you have nukes its a detterent
kingmob
09-12-2004, 05:35 AM
Originally posted by senshuken
Think about it honestly if any country in the world could be the only country with nukes who would you want it too be.
I sure as **** would want it to be the americans. We are proven to be responsible with it and every american know we would never us nukes only as a last result. Thats proven. Now all these other countries who cry americans are bullies, I bet if they were in power they would abuse it.
**** ma n you american or not? I mean seriiously you got such a problem ge the **** out! I live in ny. I saw ground zero i know people who losed loved ones. You the same kind of american dweb who would have said all this if we attacked Bin landen and raided poor afganistan before sept 11th. If we left saddam alone alolt worse would have happenned. I mean no matter hat you say he was an evil man and getting rid of him was good for the planet
you are uninformed......we arent the only country with nukes thats a BS argument
o the ole love it or leave it argument......if you think bin laden the known bush family associate who do business all over the globe together did 911 from a cave in heroinstan then i got a bridge on the moon to sell you.......have you seen the zogby poll where half of new yorkers think that the govt. did 911....here it is......i guess half of us are kooks now
zogby poll (http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=855)
i love my country thats why im standing up and pointing out the criminals who are in power.....there like cockroaches ...they scurry away when you shine a light on them
kingmob
09-12-2004, 05:36 AM
Originally posted by senshuken
since i am venting i would just like to say the FRENCH SUCK!! One of our biggest mistake was losing american lives to save there asses. We should have let the germans take them over and today it would ve part of germany. I mean these people have the balls to condem us and try to tell us what to do?? we saved there asses in both world wars, not only should they shut up but they owe us big time and should have sent troops to fight with us. We lost thouusand of americans saving there asses.
you watch too much cable news propaganda.....kill your tv and go read a book or sumthin
senshuken
09-12-2004, 02:01 PM
half of new yorkers think bush did 911? your a ***** i live in ny and know that is totally fabricated. Just because some dude made up a poll were he choose people in a certian way does not mean it is true. That poll is so false. like i said i live in ny and that is the first time i ever heard anyone ever say anything like that? poll is ********. Were do you live?
Oh and to let you know we are deathly affraind of n. korea. Because we think they might have it already. And that is why we are not taking them out BNECAUSE THEY COULD USE IT ON US! thats the whole point of iraq. Your also such a dumbass lol you said s korea has nukes lol. no they don't. they are not even close. s korea has the better economy and they are democratic. Dud remember the korean war or are you just not that educated
Man you and all your ******** sources. poeple can write whatever they want doesn't mean it is true. And new yorkers, me , you none of us have any idea what really is going on. I mean the cia knows. all the countries you listed i bet we have agents in all of them watching and we could have secrect stealt attacks. none of us no so stop making **** up. I go on facts.
GO WATCH ANOTHER MICHEAL MOORE MOVIE. I mean how could you guys get coned by a guy like that. he is a bufoon and just listen to him talk. he is doing this all for the money! and you just giving it to him
kingmob
09-12-2004, 03:54 PM
Originally posted by senshuken
half of new yorkers think bush did 911? your a ***** i live in ny and know that is totally fabricated. Just because some dude made up a poll were he choose people in a certian way does not mean it is true. That poll is so false. like i said i live in ny and that is the first time i ever heard anyone ever say anything like that? poll is ********. Were do you live?
Oh and to let you know we are deathly affraind of n. korea. Because we think they might have it already. And that is why we are not taking them out BNECAUSE THEY COULD USE IT ON US! thats the whole point of iraq. Your also such a dumbass lol you said s korea has nukes lol. no they don't. they are not even close. s korea has the better economy and they are democratic. Dud remember the korean war or are you just not that educated
Man you and all your ******** sources. poeple can write whatever they want doesn't mean it is true. And new yorkers, me , you none of us have any idea what really is going on. I mean the cia knows. all the countries you listed i bet we have agents in all of them watching and we could have secrect stealt attacks. none of us no so stop making **** up. I go on facts.
GO WATCH ANOTHER MICHEAL MOORE MOVIE. I mean how could you guys get coned by a guy like that. he is a bufoon and just listen to him talk. he is doing this all for the money! and you just giving it to him
did you check the link? zogby is one of the most highly respected pollsters out there......
s. korea nuke tests....japan times (http://www.japantoday.com/e/?content=news&cat=1&id=311675) ....i live in austin
yeah i remember the korean war ...it was a UN operation you retard....we just had troops there...it was under a UN flag....thats why it was so funked up
michael moore's movie is pure BS....he didnt cover any facts about 911.....other than how we flew the bin-ladens out of country on 9/12/01 when no one could fly
your ignoranant......you can call me names all you want ....i just laugh at you.....because you know nothing
senshuken
09-12-2004, 05:33 PM
i dunno the facts about that but may be he did fly out bin ladein's family and that was probly a good thing because if i ran into them i would have probably killed them a t that time. Wouldn't a liberal **** like you do the same thing in not wanting the laden's to get harmed?
I mean honestly what are you trying to get at?? what did bush do so wrong?? Ok maybe there was no nukes and we were told there was so what?? fact is saddam was a bad man and cruel to the human race. it was a good thing he is out of power!
kingmob
09-12-2004, 07:18 PM
Originally posted by senshuken
i dunno the facts about that but may be he did fly out bin ladein's family and that was probly a good thing because if i ran into them i would have probably killed them a t that time. Wouldn't a liberal **** like you do the same thing in not wanting the laden's to get harmed?
I mean honestly what are you trying to get at?? what did bush do so wrong?? Ok maybe there was no nukes and we were told there was so what?? fact is saddam was a bad man and cruel to the human race. it was a good thing he is out of power!
according to the official govt. party line binladen did 911.....the reason the binladens were flown out is because they are bush family business partners
why would obl wanna kill his old business partner? (http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/Hatfield-R-091901/hatfield-r-091901.html)
bush thwarts fbi binladen investigation (http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/bush_twarted.htm)
besides a bunch of supposed hijackers are still alive
still alive (http://www.prisonplanet.com/hijack_suspects_alive_and_well.htm)
saddam was our man in baghdad....he's nothing but a convenient boogey man...he has cia connections going back to 1959
saddam cia's boy (http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030410-070214-6557r)
call me a liar dispute the facts....whatever....please provide a link to back up your arguments instead of talking out yor arse
williethebasset
09-12-2004, 09:09 PM
King,
When we debate, at least I listen to you. Lets agree to stop feeding the troll or he needs to tone it down.
williethebasset
09-12-2004, 09:10 PM
By the way, I'm guessing he has the 12 year old troll syndrome.
williethebasset
09-12-2004, 09:15 PM
Originally posted by senshuken
Now back to hitler. after WWI we ignored germany and let hitler build up a massive army. No one kept and eye on him till it was too late. he built and awsome army and ended up killing millions of people and americans.
1. Got WMD?
2. We didnt ignore Germany, get your history right.
3. No one could have stopped the Wermacht, the Allied armies would have been destroyed, had they faced an equal number of German troops. Their tanks and most equipment was superior to ours.
4. I'm not trying to defend hitler, but Stalin killed more people than Hitler did. Most German Soldiers that fought on the Ost Front served life terms in Russian prisons following the war.
williethebasset
09-12-2004, 09:20 PM
Never mind king,
This idiot has given me enough stuff to correct him for a few hours.
williethebasset
09-12-2004, 09:25 PM
Originally posted by senshuken
since i am venting i would just like to say the FRENCH SUCK!! One of our biggest mistake was losing american lives to save there asses. We should have let the germans take them over and today it would ve part of germany. I mean these people have the balls to condem us and try to tell us what to do?? we saved there asses in both world wars, not only should they shut up but they owe us big time and should have sent troops to fight with us. We lost thouusand of americans saving there asses.
1. If we did not go into France then the red army would not have stopped in Berlin. And they would have had all the technology the Germans discovered.
2. The Germans did take it over. They invaded in 1940, and occupied parts of france until 1945.
3. The Iraq war was based on a lie. I admit that I believed them.
4. You are an idiot. You dont know **** about any history. Please do yourself a favor and shut the **** up.
williethebasset
09-12-2004, 09:28 PM
Originally posted by senshuken
Oh and to let you know we are deathly affraind of n. korea. Because we think they might have it already. And that is why we are not taking them out BNECAUSE THEY COULD USE IT ON US! thats the whole point of iraq. Your also such a dumbass lol you said s korea has nukes lol. no they don't. they are not even close. s korea has the better economy and they are democratic. Dud remember the korean war or are you just not that educated
Man you and all your ******** sources. poeple can write whatever they want doesn't mean it is true. And new yorkers, me , you none of us have any idea what really is going on. I mean the cia knows. all the countries you listed i bet we have agents in all of them watching and we could have secrect stealt attacks. none of us no so stop making **** up. I go on facts.
GO WATCH ANOTHER MICHEAL MOORE MOVIE. I mean how could you guys get coned by a guy like that. he is a bufoon and just listen to him talk. he is doing this all for the money! and you just giving it to him
1. There is no oil in North Korea.
2. If we wanted to take out North Korea we could. Bush is going to wait for the draft for that to happen.
3. You think the CIA is like how it is in the movies.
4. Michael Moore is like Rush Limbaugh, the major difference being, Moore uses facts.
senshuken
09-12-2004, 09:32 PM
ok your just as much an *** a the other guy.
1. We defeated germany in WWI. so obviously they surrender to us. Now if there was troops kept there and watched hitler would not have been stong enough to come to power.
2. does it really matter that i said we stoped germany from taking over france instead of saying they did and we drove them back out? no actually it just proves my point even more there would be no french if it weren't for us.
3. you can't tell me you really believe in the nonsense and all this guys conspiracy ****. you really believe bush is business partners with bin laden? give me a break.
senshuken
09-12-2004, 09:35 PM
what does n. korea have to do with not having oil
never said they did.
moore uses facts. lol the very little facts he uses he manipulates them to look in his favor. I mean say he does a poll he could find idiots like you and the other dude and poll you morons and say this is how america feels. you know what i hope one day one of these terrorist ****s kills you or better yet someone you love. then maybe you can understand.
williethebasset
09-12-2004, 09:46 PM
Originally posted by senshuken
ok your just as much an *** a the other guy.
1. We defeated germany in WWI. so obviously they surrender to us. Now if there was troops kept there and watched hitler would not have been stong enough to come to power.
2. does it really matter that i said we stoped germany from taking over france instead of saying they did and we drove them back out? no actually it just proves my point even more there would be no french if it weren't for us.
3. you can't tell me you really believe in the nonsense and all this guys conspiracy ****. you really believe bush is business partners with bin laden? give me a break.
1. Yes, but even I know, that during the Armstice the US kept sending troops over to prepare for a final attack if Germany did not accept the treaty of Versailles. Hitler came to power because of frustration with the decimated German economy and a rise of national socialism.
2. France would have been made a puppet of the USSR after WWII, just like the rest of the Eastern European countries.
3. I really am just killing time debating with an idiot like you.
senshuken
09-12-2004, 09:49 PM
yeah same here i know someone as dense as you will never change especially whe you just agreed with what i said. so were do you live and how old are you? never answered
williethebasset
09-12-2004, 09:55 PM
Originally posted by senshuken
what does n. korea have to do with not having oil
never said they did.
moore uses facts. lol the very little facts he uses he manipulates them to look in his favor. I mean say he does a poll he could find idiots like you and the other dude and poll you morons and say this is how america feels. you know what i hope one day one of these terrorist ****s kills you or better yet someone you love. then maybe you can understand.
1. Iraq is vital to an uninterruptable supply of oil.
2. Limbaugh doesnt use any facts. Moore does.
williethebasset
09-12-2004, 09:59 PM
Originally posted by senshuken
yeah same here i know someone as dense as you will never change especially whe you just agreed with what i said. so were do you live and how old are you? never answered
I used to be a hard lefty, I'm a left leaning moderate.
I dont buy anything from China, I oppose most gun control, I oppose urestricted abortions, and several other things. I always buy american when possible, even if it means paying more money.
williethebasset
09-12-2004, 10:02 PM
By the way.
16
I live in a middle class town, the last of the Boston subrubs.
Scorey1974
09-12-2004, 11:13 PM
Originally posted by senshuken
3. you can't tell me you really believe in the nonsense and all this guys conspiracy ****. you really believe bush is business partners with bin laden? give me a break.
Money does strange things to people...
Our own US Federal government has decided that "we the people" are on a need to know basis....And we do not need to know what is going on to be able to trust them...Do you buy that BS...I sure don't....
Let me say it again--Money does strange things to people...That's something to ponder
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.8 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.