PDA

View Full Version : Quiz



williethebasset
06-18-2005, 05:33 PM
Someone I know online made this quiz. Tell me what you get.



edited: by boomboom..this thread is now closed...

robinhoodnik
06-18-2005, 06:24 PM
A headache!

robinhoodnik
06-18-2005, 10:34 PM
I think I've uncovered your evil plot willie! You're really HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SFSteveG
06-19-2005, 02:27 AM
I think I've uncovered your evil plot willie! You're really HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOL! I'm not racist, I just hate stupid people. I wouldn't go to the projects any more than I'd go to your house willie ;)

That board is absolutely the most ignorant thing I've ever seen, and I've seen George W.

robinhoodnik
06-19-2005, 10:18 AM
I'm beginning to think willie lives in a trailer with a '72 Volvo up on cinder blocks in the front yard. Maybe an old, Ford pickup bench seat out there next to a bathtub Jesus. :D :) :D :rolleyes:

williethebasset
06-19-2005, 11:42 AM
I got a 360. I don't hate anyone.

robinhoodnik
06-19-2005, 02:40 PM
I got a 360. I don't hate anyone.
If you have over 300 points, you might just be a member of a racialist group, if not, you probably will be soon.

Did you not read the above scores? You're an elitist for sure, you're an IDIOT undoubtedly, a racist most definately.

williethebasset
06-19-2005, 06:57 PM
Just because I am a racialist, it does not mean that I hate anyone, I just know that certain ethnic groups are inferior and superior.

robinhoodnik
06-20-2005, 09:39 PM
Just because I am a racialist, it does not mean that I hate anyone, I just know that certain ethnic groups are inferior and superior.

1. Well, obviously. If Einstein wasn't asian he never would have figured out that E=mc2.
2. The theory of relativity has NOTHING to do with how close you can marry in YOUR own family willie.

SFSteveG
06-21-2005, 01:41 AM
1. Well, obviously. If Einstein wasn't asian he never would have figured out that E=mc2.
2. The theory of relativity has NOTHING to do with how close you can marry in YOUR own family willie.
I tend to equate arguing with willie to post padding. I mean, it's like arguing semantics with an "English as a second language" 7 year old.

I've got more by the way if this keeps up.

robinhoodnik
06-21-2005, 07:53 AM
It's kinda like beating up a loudmouthed bum. It's not fair, but it can be satisfying. ;)

Jeff Olsen
06-21-2005, 02:25 PM
Someone I know online made this quiz. Tell me what you get.

http://www.sovereignkingdoms.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=447I get the impression that someone's been reading too much MAD magazine. Looks like the sort of "quiz" they would run.

williethebasset
06-21-2005, 03:16 PM
1. Well, obviously. If Einstein wasn't asian he never would have figured out that E=mc2.
2. The theory of relativity has NOTHING to do with how close you can marry in YOUR own family willie.

1. He WASN'T Asian. Does he look Asian to you?
http://lynx.uio.no/jon/gif/famous/einstein.gif

2. I am not planning on marrying anyone in my own family, nor has anyone in my family done that.

williethebasset
06-21-2005, 03:17 PM
I get the impression that someone's been reading too much MAD magazine. Looks like the sort of "quiz" they would run.

No, he's serious, look at the other things we discuss on there.

robinhoodnik
06-21-2005, 05:27 PM
1. He WASN'T Asian. Does he look Asian to you?
http://lynx.uio.no/jon/gif/famous/einstein.gif

2. I am not planning on marrying anyone in my own family, nor has anyone in my family done that.

As well as common sense and decency, sarcasm escapes you too. :rolleyes:

robinhoodnik
06-21-2005, 05:29 PM
willie, if it isn't inbreeding then we've eliminated ONE thing. Now, ever had a head injury?????

williethebasset
06-21-2005, 06:45 PM
I don't think any of my views are off. They're only uncommon because of the liberals and their movement since the 1960s. Most of my views were simply made a "thought crime", when in fact they can be proven, against the word of God, or are just wrong.

robinhoodnik
06-21-2005, 07:34 PM
The people you are calling liberals are really not liberals. They are far left wing activists. You on the other hand have far right leanings. Don't take this as criticism, it isn't, just my observation. I am a right leaning moderate. Most people are moderates now since neither major party really represents the majority of it's members. Many people still vote (as I'm sure you know from living in MA) purely for thier party's candidate simply because they are of that party.
You aren't guilty of any Orwellian "thought crime". You are just a victim of your own lack of restraint in dealing with other people and poor judgement. I think that you may be a fairly bright individual, but you need to think things out a little more before you post. At least think out the wording and try to phrase your posts a little more eloquently.

SFSteveG
06-22-2005, 02:44 AM
Frankly I'd call willie fascist.


fas·cism
A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
From left to right political styles go Communist-Socialist-Democrat-Republican--Fascism

robinhoodnik
06-22-2005, 03:15 AM
I think that his "Liberals" are the socialists and communistic Dems. Both parties seem to have thier extremists running for everything these days.

Jeff Olsen
06-22-2005, 09:45 AM
Just because I am a racialist, it does not mean that I hate anyone, I just know that certain ethnic groups are inferior and superior.How about taking your non-baseball stuff to the Stormfront boards? You should find plenty of like-minded individuals over there.

rshackelford
06-22-2005, 03:19 PM
Being an anthropologist I can assure you that no "race" is genetically superior to another.

williethebasset
06-22-2005, 03:21 PM
How about taking your non-baseball stuff to the Stormfront boards? You should find plenty of like-minded individuals over there.

Most of the people there have no reasoning for their views, they just like making noise. Either that, or they are Nazi's, or just poor trash.

williethebasset
06-22-2005, 03:26 PM
I think that you may be a fairly bright individual, but you need to think things out a little more before you post. At least think out the wording and try to phrase your posts a little more eloquently.

That's exactly what one of my teachers told me yesterday. I need to think more before I form my views.

williethebasset
06-22-2005, 03:35 PM
Being an anthropologist I can assure you that no "race" is genetically superior to another.

Since when do people that dig up bones know about genes?

Explain the differences in IQ tests, and why wherever blacks go, destruction is sure to follow, and the various other things that coloreds bring with them.

Jeff Olsen
06-22-2005, 04:07 PM
Most of the people there have no reasoning for their views, they just like making noise. Which is why your non-baseball posts would fit right in--they're all "noise" to us. Case in point:
wherever blacks go, destruction is sure to follow, and the various other things that coloreds bring with them.

Jeff Olsen
06-22-2005, 04:21 PM
On second thought, willie, try this forum (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/forumdisplay.php?f=7) instead. You'll find plenty of intelligent people there willing to debate you. Posting is free for the first 30 days, after which you'd have to pay $14.95 per to continue--although I'd be surprised if you manage to stick around that long.

rshackelford
06-22-2005, 04:49 PM
Archaeologists dig up bones, you can be an anthropologist and not be and archaeologist. The lower IQ scores you bring up can not be attributed to one race. 94% of all genetic variation between people comes from the genes in your own so called "racial group". In other words there is a greater physical variation between two people of the same race, then there is between two different "races" themselves. As far as your comment that coloreds bring destruction with them, culture is learned from your environment not born with you. You werent born with the genetics to speak english or dress western, you learned that culture from your surroundings, so colored races arent born with a destructive nature.

williethebasset
06-22-2005, 07:10 PM
On second thought, willie, try this forum (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/forumdisplay.php?f=7) instead. You'll find plenty of intelligent people there willing to debate you. Posting is free for the first 30 days, after which you'd have to pay $14.95 per to continue--although I'd be surprised if you manage to stick around that long.

I can debate here just fine. I do not flame, threaten, or bait other users, which has been done to me here several times.

williethebasset
06-22-2005, 07:23 PM
Archaeologists dig up bones, you can be an anthropologist and not be and archaeologist. The lower IQ scores you bring up can not be attributed to one race. 94% of all genetic variation between people comes from the genes in your own so called "racial group". In other words there is a greater physical variation between two people of the same race, then there is between two different "races" themselves. As far as your comment that coloreds bring destruction with them, culture is learned from your environment not born with you. You werent born with the genetics to speak english or dress western, you learned that culture from your surroundings, so colored races arent born with a destructive nature.

http://library.flawlesslogic.com/iq.htm

I think is picture sums it up well.
http://library.flawlesslogic.com/bell.gif

How am I more like a colored than a fellow white? It cannot work that way, you are politicizing this science.

robinhoodnik
06-22-2005, 07:34 PM
Since when do people that dig up bones know about genes?

Explain the differences in IQ tests, and why wherever blacks go, destruction is sure to follow, and the various other things that coloreds bring with them.

The same things happened when the Irish immigrated en masse to NYC also the Italians and any other racial or ethnic group you can name. You don't think that destruction follows whites? How about the British empire? The Spanish conquest of South America? The Vikings did it, The Japanese did it, Nearly every "civilized" religion and culture that I can think of has been a part of or sponsored it. Even American Indians did it and had it done to them. You just need to look a little deeper on your own, and NOT take for truth ANY thing that friends, teachers, or even your parents tell you without checking it out for yourself. If it is in a history book, go out and get the other point of view. It will take a bit longer to research it, but you'll at least have the whole story. Only then are you really qualified to give an opinion.

robinhoodnik
06-22-2005, 07:41 PM
That's exactly what one of my teachers told me yesterday. I need to think more before I form my views.

Try and stop and question why you feel a certain thing is as it is. This isn't an insult so don't take it as such. You need to learn to think and reason. It was impressed upon me at a very young age that this is the key to real learning. You can go to all the educational institutions in the world but it'll make not one bit of difference if you cannot properly process information and form a clear and well reasoned response to a problem. This is a very important skill that isn't easy to acquire but once you do nothing is too hard or impossible. This isn't double think as you've been told, it is not changing your own opinion and fooling yourself into believing untruths either. This is rational thought and following a logical path to a correct conclusion. All the best scientists do it and it would not hurt any one to put a little more thought into things once in a while.

williethebasset
06-22-2005, 08:25 PM
The same things happened when the Irish immigrated en masse to NYC also the Italians and any other racial or ethnic group you can name. You don't think that destruction follows whites? How about the British empire? The Spanish conquest of South America? The Vikings did it, The Japanese did it, Nearly every "civilized" religion and culture that I can think of has been a part of or sponsored it. Even American Indians did it and had it done to them. You just need to look a little deeper on your own, and NOT take for truth ANY thing that friends, teachers, or even your parents tell you without checking it out for yourself. If it is in a history book, go out and get the other point of view. It will take a bit longer to research it, but you'll at least have the whole story. Only then are you really qualified to give an opinion.

The British civilized most of the world. So did the Spanish to an extent, and "destruction" generally is when things only go down when someone comes along. Where the Irish built the Erie Canal, and most of Boston. Destruction is when something is damaged, what the western nations did in many places was not destruction. They gave plenty of equipment, money, and left behind vast infastructres in africa, only to see it destroyed. It happened similarly in South Vietnam after the US left.

williethebasset
06-22-2005, 08:26 PM
Try and stop and question why you feel a certain thing is as it is. This isn't an insult so don't take it as such. You need to learn to think and reason. It was impressed upon me at a very young age that this is the key to real learning. You can go to all the educational institutions in the world but it'll make not one bit of difference if you cannot properly process information and form a clear and well reasoned response to a problem. This is a very important skill that isn't easy to acquire but once you do nothing is too hard or impossible. This isn't double think as you've been told, it is not changing your own opinion and fooling yourself into believing untruths either. This is rational thought and following a logical path to a correct conclusion. All the best scientists do it and it would not hurt any one to put a little more thought into things once in a while.

I am just learning, I'm sure I'll be enlightned more once I'm out of the valley of death, AKA High School.

robinhoodnik
06-22-2005, 08:34 PM
The British civilized most of the world. So did the Spanish to an extent, and "destruction" generally is when things only go down when someone comes along. Where the Irish built the Erie Canal, and most of Boston. Destruction is when something is damaged, what the western nations did in many places was not destruction. They gave plenty of equipment, money, and left behind vast infastructres in africa, only to see it destroyed. It happened similarly in South Vietnam after the US left.

I think that the South American civilizations that Spain destroyed would feel a whole lot differently about that. Similarly, do you think that the British colonies really wanted what they got? I think that they were assimilated into an alien culture under pain of death. If British rule was such a popular option, why did our very own country rebel?

robinhoodnik
06-22-2005, 08:38 PM
Nice job! After the whole blacks and destruction post, you are actually having a debate so far.

williethebasset
06-22-2005, 08:45 PM
I think that the South American civilizations that Spain destroyed would feel a whole lot differently about that. Similarly, do you think that the British colonies really wanted what they got? I think that they were assimilated into an alien culture under pain of death. If British rule was such a popular option, why did our very own country rebel?

Our country rebeled for different reasons than most places. Our rebellion was organized, backed by the populace, free of innocent blood (for the most part), and gave birth to the best form of government, a republic.

On the other hand most rebellions in Africa and Central America were unorganized, the civillian supporters of the imperial power were raped and killed, and dictatorships arise.

To answer your question, British rule was a good option to uncivilized people, Canada and the US did fine without them, but other places did not.

Jeff Olsen
06-22-2005, 08:49 PM
I can debate here just fine.What I was suggesting was for you to try your debating style out in a forum that is specifically geared toward debate. Your topics would certainly garner more attention at at the site I linked.

By the way, what you're doing here isn't really debating. If it were, you wouldn't have so many people dismissing you as a troll.

rshackelford
06-23-2005, 02:43 AM
What I was trying to say is that two people of the same "race" have on average a 94% genetic variation between each other. Comparing two different "races" they have on average a 6% genetic variation. There are no no racial diffrences in intelligence between "races".

boomboom
06-23-2005, 03:07 AM
Now willie, it seems you are being a troll...this is the sports mogul forum, for sports, I know this is the ejections thread... but i have to ask you to stop...posting ignorant stuff on here only upsets people, before you post please have all the facts...

I am closing this thread, and deleting your link...