Page 70 of 111 FirstFirst ... 20 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ... LastLast
Results 1,036 to 1,050 of 1663

Thread: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

  1. #1036
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cowcrap Town
    Posts
    20,704

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    I saw this earlier. What a prick.
    I enjoyed the part we he misspoken, I'm sure if he said the exact opposite, which would make the conservaderps mad, he would say the samething. Tired of peoples ****.
    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    I'm an idiot

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    lern 2 english

  2. #1037
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    Posts
    15,976

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/21/op...=2&ref=opinion

    Moore and Oliver Stone on Assange and the dangers of extraditing him

  3. #1038
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    45,580

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Quote Originally Posted by OregonDuck1989 View Post
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/21/op...=2&ref=opinion

    Moore and Oliver Stone on Assange and the dangers of expediting him
    *Extraditing

  4. #1039
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    Posts
    15,976

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    *Extraditing
    Yeah that, just woke up.

  5. #1040
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cowcrap Town
    Posts
    20,704

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Why I hate the GOP. Two party system makes all the rules to prevent the rise of a 3rd, in my eyes legitimate person to run our country.

    http://paindependent.com/2012/08/rep...lvania-ballot/

    HARRISBURG — The Pennsylvania Republican Party has already booted one third-party candidate from the state’s presidential ballot and is making life difficult for Libertarian Party presidential nominee Gary Johnson.

    Republican voters acting on behalf of the state GOP this week officially challenged the signatures submitted by Johnson, the former governor of New Mexico, who is seeking an equal place on the November ballot beside major party candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.


    Libertarian Party presidential nominee and former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson could be knocked off the ballot in Pennsylvania by the Republican Party.
    Ron Nielson, senior adviser for the Johnson campaign, told PA Independent on Wednesday that the campaign submitted more than 49,000 signatures — more than twice the amount required to gain access to the ballot in Pennsylvania.

    He said the campaign expected to survive the challenge from the Republicans.

    “The two major parties have a lot of money they can use to maintain the status quo,” he said. “We’re trying to give the voters a choice between the policies of Obama and Romney, and we’re going to fight to stay on the ballot because we think the voters deserve to have that choice.”

    The signatures will be challenged in Commonwealth Court.

    Thursday is the final day for a candidate to qualify for the ballot, but the court could strike a candidate from the ballot after that date if it was determined they did not have enough signatures following a challenge.

    In order to qualify for the ballot in Pennsylvania, the major parties have to submit only 2,000 signatures, but third party candidates had to collect more than 20,000 this year.

    The process is fundamentally unfair, and the major parties have plenty of resources to go to war against candidates they are concerned may slice into their share of the vote.

    “The two major parties are preventing democracy from taking place in Pennsylvania,” said Robert Small, facilitator for the Pennsylvania Ballot Access Coalition, which fights for the equal access for all parties. Small is a registered member of the Green Party.

    Even if there isn’t a challenge, the third parties have to spend time and resources gathering all those signatures that could otherwise be used campaigning, Small said.

    In 2006, Pennsylvania was named by the Helsinki Accords as one of the worst places in the world to have a free election. The Helsinki Accords is an international group that monitors elections. The group specifically pointed to Pennsylvania as an example of how ballot access laws in the United States limit some groups’ rights to participate in elections.

    Other third parties also have felt the heavy hand of the two party oligarchy.

    The Constitution Party withdrew its presidential candidate, Virgil Goode, from the state ballot on Tuesday. The party submitted 35,000 signatures, but state law would have required them to cover the cost of legal fees if the Republicans had been able to successfully challenge enough of the signatures to bring them under the state threshold.

    Jim Clymer, a lawyer and state treasurer for the Pennsylvania Constitution Party, said those fees could have easily exceeded $100,000.

    “We pulled out because we were threatened with having to pay their legal fees if we did not prevail,” he said. “The numbers made it appear doubtful that we would be able to survive.”

    Valerie Caras, spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania Republican Party, said Wednesday the party was fighting to protect the integrity of the ballot by challenging the Libertarian and Constitution candidates.

    “Our Commonwealth’s election guidelines require nominating petitions to contain legitimate signatures of registered voters. Upon close inspection, neither set of nominating petitions meets that standard,” she wrote in an email.

    The battle over signatures is the second ballot access battle Johnson’s campaign has had to fight this week in the Keystone State.

    On Tuesday night, Johnson had to fly cross-country from New Mexico to Pennsylvania in order to re-sign documents in front of officials at the Pennsylvania Department of State on Wednesday morning.

    The issue: Johnson’s original submission lacked an apostille – a form of certification for documents similar to having something notarized – and was deemed invalid by state officials on Tuesday.

    “The Republican Party has a room full of lawyers who can go through and challenge these signatures and all we have is a bunch of volunteers who have taken off from work to collect the signatures and fight the challenges,” Nielson said.

    He said the Libertarian Party is on the ballot in 36 states and in the process of qualifying for the ballot in the remaining 14 states plus the District of Columbia.

    Pennsylvania has more than 4.1 million registered Democrats and nearly 3.1 million registered Republicans, according to the latest voter registration figures.

    There are fewer than 1.1 million people in the state registered at members of third parties or as registered independents.

    Even so, the major parties have reason to fear those small groups of people, said Terry Madonna, a professor of political science at Franklin and Marshall College in Lancaster.

    “In a close election, they don’t want the minor party to drain votes away from their candidates,” Madonna said. “It’s rare that it makes a difference, but we saw it make a difference in Florida in 2000.”

    In that instance, Green Party candidate Ralph Nader won 97,000 votes in Florida, while the gap between Republican candidate George W. Bush and Democratic candidate Al Gore was fewer than 540 votes.
    Also Republicans are ****ing dumb. They act like if they have their way with Johnson, all the votes that would be for Johnson would go towards Romney. Further from the truth, I for one will either not vote, or vote out of spite against the Republicans for their ****. (Probably just not vote)
    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    I'm an idiot

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    lern 2 english

  6. #1041
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pullman, WA
    Posts
    5,307

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Quote Originally Posted by ragecage View Post
    Why I hate the GOP. Two party system makes all the rules to prevent the rise of a 3rd, in my eyes legitimate person to run our country.

    http://paindependent.com/2012/08/rep...lvania-ballot/



    Also Republicans are ****ing dumb. They act like if they have their way with Johnson, all the votes that would be for Johnson would go towards Romney. Further from the truth, I for one will either not vote, or vote out of spite against the Republicans for their ****. (Probably just not vote)
    If it makes you feel better, the Libertarian Party here in WA. State are trying to get Romney off the ballot here.
    http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/spinc...hington-ballot

  7. #1042
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cowcrap Town
    Posts
    20,704

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Quote Originally Posted by asianinvasion View Post
    If it makes you feel better, the Libertarian Party here in WA. State are trying to get Romney off the ballot here.
    http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/spinc...hington-ballot
    Would be funny, wont happen though.
    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    I'm an idiot

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    lern 2 english

  8. #1043
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    Posts
    15,976

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Does Ann Coulter believe the **** she says?

    http://observer.com/2007/10/coulter-culture/

  9. #1044
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    203

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Quote Originally Posted by OregonDuck1989 View Post
    Does Ann Coulter believe the **** she says?

    http://observer.com/2007/10/coulter-culture/
    Don't all insane people?

  10. #1045
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    6,336

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Quote Originally Posted by OregonDuck1989 View Post
    Does Ann Coulter believe the **** she says?

    http://observer.com/2007/10/coulter-culture/
    Ann Coulter is a right-wing bomb thrower, someone whose job is to throw red meat to the psychopathic wing of the GOP base. She's carved out a decent niche for herself.
    derp

  11. #1046
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pullman, WA
    Posts
    5,307

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)


  12. #1047
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    6,833

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Holy crap this had me laughing

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/we...lican-platform

    Republicans promote a full ban on abortion, even in cases of rape or abortion. Romney, however, has supported exceptions for rape and incest. So republicans faced with this dissonance say that it's Romney's personal choice - and who are they to tell someone how they should feel on this issue?

    Seriously, do conservatives even hear themselves anymore? Their nominee can have personal liberties and the right to choose...but the country can't?

  13. #1048
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    Posts
    15,976

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)


  14. #1049
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,021

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Quote Originally Posted by Alloutwar View Post
    Holy crap this had me laughing

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/we...lican-platform

    Republicans promote a full ban on abortion, even in cases of rape or abortion. Romney, however, has supported exceptions for rape and incest. So republicans faced with this dissonance say that it's Romney's personal choice - and who are they to tell someone how they should feel on this issue?

    Seriously, do conservatives even hear themselves anymore? Their nominee can have personal liberties and the right to choose...but the country can't?
    Don't lump all conservatives together please.

  15. #1050
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    Posts
    15,976

    Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)

    Fox News even puts Paul Ryan on blast

    I'm just blown away at how awful this man is

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •